Revegetation and restoration of native terrestrial vegetation (vascular plants and other non-vascular primary producers such as lichens and bryophytes) can be used to revegetate areas where vegetation has completely disappeared or to restore degraded vegetation.
Mountain ecosystem before NbS have been implemented
Mountain ecosystem after NbS have been implemented
Revegetation and restoration can be applied in any ecosystem where vegetation is present naturally but has disappeared or been degraded. To be successful, knowledge of the living (biotic) and non-living (abiotic) components of the ecosystem is required. The combination of biotic and abiotic conditions, as well as financial considerations, will determine restoration aims, appropriate methods, and species.
Vegetation is an integral component of almost any terrestrial ecosystem and essential for ecosystem functioning and ecosystem services. Revegetation of barren land and restoration of degraded vegetation have positive effects on biodiversity, will reduce the risk of soil erosion by water or wind, improve soil quality, contribute to carbon cycling and storage both above and below ground, and may positively affect human health.
The mitigation hierarchy for impacts on biodiversity and nature (above) depicts the order of prioritization. Avoidance, or protection is the top priority, followed by minimization of damage, restoration and compensation.
Protect rather than restore
Avoiding the degradation and loss of vegetation should always be top priority. If impacts on vegetation are unavoidable however, impacts should be reduced as much as possible. Restoring vegetation should never be an after-thought, but rather be incorporated from the start of any project that may induce a need for restoration of vegetation. As such, measures that will benefit restoration efforts may be taken as the project proceeds: local topsoil can be collected and put in place at the final phase of the project, seeds of native plants can be collected before vegetation is removed, nursery beds can be established to temporarily store native plants which can later be placed back. These measures may be hard to implement when revegetation or restoration is not planned in advance. Compensating loss of nature or vegetation elsewhere is lowest on the priority list.
Site assessment and setting a reference state
Before restoration is started, site conditions (including but not limited to climate, biodiversity, geology, pollution) at the restoration site should be surveyed. In addition, the drivers of ecosystem degradation should be identified.
To set a restoration goal, a reference ecosystem should be chosen. Choice of reference ecosystem is not always obvious. The reference state can be either based on historical accounts of what the ecosystem looked like before drivers of degradation became effective, or an intact ecosystem in a location with similar conditions. In some cases, a part of the area to be restored has good condition and can serve as a reference state for the rest of the area. If no reference ecosystem can be found, a theoretical ecosystem state can be used for example based on species prediction models. It may also be possible to get inspiration from sites in other countries with similar ecosystems.
When the current conditions and drivers of degradation, as well as the reference ecosystem are known, restoration goals can be formulated. Large and long-term projects will benefit from an adaptive process, where goals are evaluated and adjusted as the project progresses. Sub-goals can be formulated to check if progress is on schedule or if additional measures are required to meet the final restoration goals. Clearly defined goals allow for the evaluation of revegetation and restoration efforts and are helpful to established whether the planned actions meet the best-practice guidelines for NbS.
Removing sources of degradation
Before revegetation or restoration is attempted, the drivers of degradation of vegetation should be identified and eliminated. It is unlikely to achieve restoration goals while degradation continues. Examples of such drivers include (road) construction, mining, overharvesting, overgrazing, eutrophication, pollution, or invasive species. In case the drivers of degradation are temporary and can be planned for, for example during construction works, the project should be adjusted such that initialized restoration actions are not negatively affected by other activities. For example, tracks from heavy vehicles can cause soil compaction and thereby negatively affect the establishment of flower meadows or damage the roots of set-aside trees. Relevant actors such as contractors and machine operators should be informed and educated about where, when, and how restoration efforts will be carried out.
Restoration by natural dynamics and disturbance
In some cases, natural succession (i.e., the natural change of vegetation species composition over time) is a viable restoration option once disturbing factors have been neutralized. Without a need for active measures, costs associated to this method are usually low. Downsides may be that erosion worsens soil conditions, that natural processes may act slower than desired, that naturally established vegetation may not match the reference state, that non-native species establish before native species do, or that natural revegetation is interpreted as neglect by the public.
Restoration of natural dynamics
Many ecosystems depend on disturbances on different scales and such dynamics should be considered when establishing the reference state. These disturbances may occur naturally but, in many cases, require active management. An example of a disturbance that acts at a local scale is the death of an individual tree which provides light to understorey vegetation. Forest fires and floods are examples disturbances that typically manifest at a larger scale. Disturbance can also be caused by herbivores such as deer and cattle. In some cases, restoring the natural ecosystem dynamics is sufficient for restoration to achieve the desired ecosystem state.
Restoration of abiotic conditions
Abiotic conditions are an important driver of vegetation composition. For vegetation, climate, soil conditions, and hydrology are particularly important. Terrain features such as slopes, depressions, and outcrops should be restored as these drive variation in soil and microclimate. For wetland vegetation, restoring hydrology is an important prerequisite. On-site treatment and improvement of soil may in some cases be possible. In other cases, soil needs to be transported to the restoration site from elsewhere. In case of eutrophication, nutrient rich topsoil may need to be removed. Heterogeneity in landscape features and soil conditions will allow diverse plant communities to co-exist.
Restoration and establishment of vegetation
In many cases, active revegetation such as transplantation of patches of vegetation or individual plants is desirable. In some cases, some initial planting is needed to stabilize soil before further revegetation is allowed to occur more naturally. Seeds can be sown directly, or seedlings can be planted out. Seed and seedling should be sourced locally to preserve genetic variation. Some plants may be propagated vegetatively, but such plants are clones and may have lower genetic diversity than desired. The transplantation of entire turfs from intact vegetation to the restoration site may in some cases be an option. When turfs are transplanted, vegetation is likely to survive. The downside is that turf transplants require some logistics and that a hole is left behind at the donor site. Large projects may incorporate trials to establish the most effective method of revegetation.
Monitoring, maintenance, and an adaptive process
Monitoring before, during and after restoration is important because it is impossible to determine whether restoration goals have been reached without monitoring. Monitoring should be planned for at project start, so that a baseline condition can be established. An adaptive process, where monitoring drives decision making, is beneficial especially to large-scale or long-term projects. After initial restoration, regular maintenance actions may be required, for example mowing or grazing of wildflower meadows. The length of the monitoring period depends on the vegetation type, but is almost always more than 10 years.
Potential outcomes
Increased vegetation cover restores ecological functioning and ecosystem services.
Enhanced biodiversity.
Reduced risk of soil erosion.
Restored vegetation may have subsequent positive effects on other organism groups such as insects, mammals, birds, etc.
Increased recreational value and associated health benefits.
Climate change mitigation e.g., through increased carbon storage in vegetation and soils.
Undesirable outcomes
Restoration actions may not result in the nature type local communities have grown accustomed to. For example: while restoring a mire, forest may disappear which strongly impacts how people experience the landscape.
Machinery used for restoration may itself lead to damage to vegetation and may promote soil erosion – impacts should be minimized.
Use of soil and plant material from outside the restoration may increase the risk of introducing non-native, invasive species or cause genetic contamination (introduction of non-local genetics).
Soil and vegetation that contains non-native species should be disposed of appropriately.
Restoration and revegetation efforts will benefit from the involvement of local communities.
The field of revegetation and restoration of vegetation is well established, and a large number of projects have been performed in different ecosystems. Monitoring is often short-term and is often discontinued before the long-term effects of restoration efforts can be quantified.
Several national and international handbooks exist - see the reference list on this page for examples.
The associated costs strongly depend on the methods used and the size of the area to be restored. Allowing vegetation to recover by natural processes can reduce costs. Landscaping (restoring slopes, terrain, etc), and any removal and treatment of contaminated soils comes with considerable costs. Monitoring is an important part of restoration projects and require funding years/decades after the actual restoration effort is complete.
Location: Norway
Site: Shooting range in Hjerkinn, Dovrefjell
Ecosystem type: Montane/alpine
Project title: Nature restoration of Hjerkinn military shooting range
Contact: Dagmar Hagen (NINA)
Relevant links and further reading:
https://www.nina.no/B%C3%A6rekraftig-samfunn/Naturrestaurering/Hjerkinn-naturrestaurering
Aasetre, J., Hagen, D., & Bye, K. (2022). Ecosystem restoration as a boundary object, demonstrated in a large-scale landscape restoration project in the Dovre Mountains, Norway. Ambio, 51(3), 586-597.
Hagen, D., Aasetre, J., & Emmelin, L. (2002). Communicative approaches to restoration ecology: a case study from Dovre Mountain and Svalbard, Norway. Landscape research, 27(4), 359-380.
Hagen, D., Evju, M., Henriksen, P. S., Solli, S., Erikstad, L., & Bartlett, J. (2022). From military training area to National Park over 20 years: Indicators for outcome evaluation in a large-scale restoration project in alpine Norway. Journal for Nature Conservation, 66, 126125.
Hagen, D., & Evju, M. (2013). Using short-term monitoring data to achieve goals in a large-scale restoration. Ecology and Society, 18(3).
Hagen, D., Hansen, T. I., Graae, B. J., & Rydgren, K. (2014). To seed or not to seed in alpine restoration: introduced grass species outcompete rather than facilitate native species. Ecological engineering, 64, 255-261.
Mehlhoop, A. C., Evju, M., & Hagen, D. (2018). Transplanting turfs to facilitate recovery in a low‐alpine environment—What matters?. Applied Vegetation Science, 21(4), 615-625.
Temahefte in Norwegian: NINA Brage: Fra skytefelt til nasjonalpark. Restaurering av Hjerkinn skytefelt på Dovrefjell
Hagen, D. & Skrindo, A.B. (red) (2010) Handbok i økologisk restaurering. Forebygging og rehabilitering av naturskade på natur og terreng. 95s. Forsvarsbygg
Vaughn, K. J., Porensky, L. M., Wilkerson, M. L., Balachowski, J., Peffer, E., Riginos, C. & Young, T. P. (2010) Restoration Ecology. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):66